The Foxwoods Experience:
Could It Happen Here?
Located in a rural
area of Connecticut, Foxwoods Casino has had a profound impact on
surrounding communities, as reported by Saugerties Times writer
Andrea Barrist Stern in an article entitled “Playing For Keeps”
(September 2, 2005). The following excerpts from that article (reprinted
with permission) summarize major developments:
Crime has risen
A mere five years
after Foxwoods Casino opened (in 1993), the sleepy town of Ledyard
(15,000 residents) had risen to fifth place statewide in crime based on
offenses at and around the casino, according to former Ledyard
supervisor Wesley Johnson ….Gambling at the casino has led to
bankruptcies, embezzlements and suicides.
Taxes have not dropped
Foxwoods
has been anything but a boon to economic development for its host
community and its neighbors nearby. "Sales tax hasn't gone away,
property taxes haven't gone down and the state has still not been able
to balance its budget," said Sharon Wadecki, a member of the Ledyard
town council. Added Nick Mullane, first selectman of the town of North
Stonington, "You don't have the governors of Connecticut or California
[where Native American gaming is more widespread] advocating other
states to embrace gambling and saying it's been good for their state."
…. "The casinos have probably cost the state $3 to $5 for every $1 it
takes in," noted Mary Beth Gorke-Felice, the owner of a bed and
breakfast in Woodstock, Connecticut, and a founder of the Connecticut
Alliance Against Casino Expansion. "So when people say Connecticut gets
$440 million a year from the casinos, … it costs the residents three
times that a year from land that's been taken into trust, taxes that
aren't paid, businesses that can't make it, and services that are
required."
Local businesses have been hurt
The casino has
siphoned off money that local residents would have spent at non-casino
restaurants, shops and entertainment venues and for other goods such as
cars and appliances… It has also drawn down the labor force, making it
difficult or impossible for some local businesses to continue - mainly
because the casino offers health benefits….Since Foxwoods opened in
1992, one hotel, one bank and three donut shops have been the only new
businesses in town, according to the Connecticut officials. Nor have the
existing businesses been able to compete in terms of supplying the
casino with food supplies and other items because of volume discounts
the casino is able to get elsewhere. At the same time, many already
existing local businesses closed or have been hard-pressed to remain
open as a direct result of the casino's presence, said Wadecki. "A
casino is difficult to compete with," said Mullane "A casino is a total
destination resort. It's a city, a town, and a shopping mall with
restaurants and everything else."
Affordable housing is harder to find
The 2004 median home sale price in that part of Connecticut was
$236,500, according to a May 8, 2005 article in The Hartford Courant,
part of a two-part series by Jeff Benedict, an attorney and the author
of Without Reservation. Casino employees are showing up in
homeless shelters or packing four or five families into a one-family
residence. A local building inspector recently cited one immigrant who
had purchased a condo and then divided the basement into five bedrooms
he rented to casino workers.
Schools have grappled with teaching
second-language learners
In addition, the
presence of Foxwoods has become a problem for school districts like
those in Norwich, where immigrant workers at the casino have settled
because they cannot afford to live closer. Speaking some 32 different
languages at home, these immigrants have created a burden for the
schools required to provide English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) courses,
remedial work, tutors, free lunches, nursing, and other special
education services, while receiving no additional property taxes to
offset the costs. The influx of this cheap labor has also affected the
school district's ability to qualify for federal funding, which is now
tied to test results under the federal No Child Left Behind legislation.
Hidden social costs have emerged
"The flood of slot
machines into this region has given rise to a new class of improbable
criminals - middle-aged women, married with children, gainfully
employed, with no criminal history - now residing in taxpayer-funded
cells," Benedict wrote on February 13, 2005 for another Connecticut
paper, The Day. "White collar crime, bankruptcy, property
foreclosure, extinguished pension funds, and divorce are hidden costs
borne by communities nearest casinos."
Embezzling by trusted employees has become a
problem
In 2001, the Ledyard tax collector went to prison for embezzling
$302,587 to support her addiction to the slot machines… In 1998, the
former tax collector for Sprague pleaded guilty to stealing more than
$105,000 from her town over three years. She had worked for the tax
collector's office for 14 years. And this year, a 25-year staff
accountant for the town of Stonington was sentenced to a year in prison
for stealing $257,000 in town funds for gambling. As a result, Ledyard
and two neighboring towns now spend a total of $100,000 a year to have
their books audited, according to Johnson and the other Connecticut
officials.
Seniors and local residents are tempted beyond
their means
A recent
study by the Pennsylvania State College of Medicine and the University
of Pennsylvania found that among a random sampling of 843 people 65 and
older who were surveyed, nearly 11% were "at risk" gamblers. In its own
study on the impact of gambling in 1999, the federal government found
that problem and pathological gambling doubles within a 50-mile radius
of a casino.
Casino expansion cannot be stopped
Nor has the [Ledyard] community been able to check the expansion at
Foxwoods, which originally opened as a high stakes bingo hall in 1986
before expanding to full a Las Vegas casino-type operation in 1992. The
casino - which now has 340,000 square feet of gaming space in a complex
that covers 4.7 million square feet, three hotels with a total of 1,416
guest rooms, 25 restaurants, a conference center with 25 conference
rooms and 55,000 square feet of meeting space, a 4,000-seat arena and
other theaters, a spa, a championship golf course, and shopping - is
currently planning its fifth expansion. Why have Connecticut officials
been unable to stem the casino's growth? "Municipal and state officials
have no control over what an Indian tribe does with its sovereign land
base," said Benedict. "If an expansion extends beyond the boundaries of
local trust lands, communities can do something about it but a
reservation is sovereign land. Not only can a tribe expand at will, they
can build other things there that would be totally illegal or
inappropriate a mile away, such as a nuclear storage site. This is the
kind of thing that has come up elsewhere in the country."
Promises by casinos cannot be enforced
Developer
Thomas Wilmot [the backer of the proposed casino in Saugerties] has
implied in meetings with local businesspeople that he and the tribe
would agree to limitations on the size of a casino in Saugerties and
would obey local laws, but Benedict said such promises are useless "if
history is relevant….You can say anything in this process but the fact
of the matter is that municipal governments have no authority to enforce
these kinds of promises. Just because a sovereign group says it will
abide by local laws, when a dispute arises and they decide they don't
want to, there is nothing to enable the town government to enforce their
laws.”
|